Thomas Jefferson once said, “…a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and
as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” Politics often
reflect a society due to the need for a government to, at least appear, to aqciest
with the general public. Society is constantly shifting and changing. The Punk
Movement embraced one of our founding father’s most famous quotes and proceeded
to stage a mini-rebellion against the norm of the time.
“The Punk Pantoum” by Pamela Stewart is a
reflection of what caused people, especially younger ones, to turn to the Punk
Movement. The author uses the speaker to
describe a generalized punk’s lifestyle and contempt for society, then
compounds it with the style of chosen poem. THe poem is a realization of the Punk movement's true goal, to reverse the trend of society twoards self-gain and conformity.
One of the most striking images in
the poem is that of a, “dismembered horse:/Rust-stained
fetlock, gristle, bone and hoof”. This violent description touches three major
components of this speaker’s life; his/her drug use, their upbringing and a
tendency towards using everyday life as a representation of a greater evil in
society.
A drug popular in the
70s era of Punks was heroin. The shift in America from marijuana to heroin
being the most “popular” drug reflected a similarly disenfranchised youth, but
with more of an edge as the 60s made way for the 70s. Horse was a street name
for heroin and is very fitting in this description of a punk life.
The blending of
heroin and a prim upper middleclass upbringing contrast well in this line. The
butchered horse could equally represent the place from which the speaker came.
“Bitch, let's be proud to live at Eutaw Place,” intones the speaker in line
ten. Eutaw Place is a neighborhood in Baltimore known for being wealthy and primarily
Jewish. One mention and we know the speaker is most likely at least
middleclass, most likely even wealthier, and white. The town itself was home to
the once famous Lexington Market. Markets are a place of trade and food was
definitely sold. It would make sense for the occasional horse to be added to
the pot.
The comparison of
these to vastly different subjects, a dismembered horse and an affluent Jewish
neighborhood, are meant to underline their hidden similarities. This grotesque
self and capital obsession was barely hidden beneath the manners and money of
the upper class, as viewed by many punks of the age.
The author chooses to accent this layering
effect in her poem. She uses the Pantoum, a style of writing that repeats lines
for emphasis. The continuation of one line to the next stanza is a reflection of how
capitalism and self-value lead to a society that has lost what should be
its values - individualism and creativity.
The author tempers this
juxtaposition with a slight altering of repeated lines to better suit the
stanza in which it is placed. “Remember how we met at the Flower Mart
last Spring?” in stanza four transforms into “Remember how you burned your hair
at the Flower Mart last May?” in stanza five. These modifications servers two
purposes. Firstly, it helps provides greater clarity and continuity. The poem
reads like a story, or perhaps a fable with it’s heavily laden moral tones, and
most follow a general timeline. The second reason the author adjusted the lines
is more ironic. It follows the idea of rebellion. The Pantoum has specific
rules, but they were broken by altering the designated repeating lines. By
fracturing the form, the author follows the described punks as they fracture
the norm of society.
The continuation of one line to the next stanza is a reflection of how capitalism and self-value lead to a society that has lost what should be its values - individuals and creativity. THIS STATEMENT IS GOOD. Make it your thesis and look to see how everything in the poem reflects this.
ReplyDelete